Home > General Information > Education and Training > Pollution coverage


Pollution coverage

Protection from pollution liability is vital for restoration contractors
General contractors have not taken seriously their pollution exposures according to Mark Elgin, a construction underwriter for ECS Underwriting, Inc. General contractors normally do not purchase pollution coverage for their day-to-day activities. Since commercial liability coverage specifically excludes pollution exposures, failure to acquire the additional coverage can have devastating consequences.

Elgin cited these instances where contractors suffered the consequences of being without pollution coverage even though their exposure was incidental:
  An excavator unknowingly removed soil contaminated with dioxin and stockpiled it on adjacent property. The EPA forced him to acquire the property and construct a containment system costing a total of $250,000.
  A mechanical contractor who incorrectly installed a HVAC system in a new office building that produced toxic mold and mildew faced claims in excess of $100,000.
  A contractor etching the exterior of a commercial building using muriatic acid allowed fumes to enter the structure. Chrome fixtures were ruined resulting in $75,000 damage.
  A major thunderstorm caused the tack coat of an asphalt parking lot to wash off into a nearby stream. Cleanup costs, which the contractor had to pay, exceeded $200,000.
  A flooring contractor reconditioning a tile floor had to pay $25,000 in defense costs and bodily injury claims because of toxic vapor inhalation by a third party who breathed in fumes from sealants.
  A bridge construction contractor was liable for a $300,000 property damage claim for lead paint chips and dust generated by a subcontractor performing abrasive sandblasting of a bridge in a residential area.